Crash totals are down, but questions about restrictor-plate races remain

Fri, Dec 18, 2009 (4:49 p.m.)

The number of crashes in Sprint Cup racing is dropping. For the second year in a row the number of wrecks and spins has gone down.

So what’s causing fewer crashes? Have the drivers become more comfortable with the car? Did the single-file racing we see at the cookie-cutter tracks make accidents less likely? Or are drivers being more careful to avoid ruining their chances of getting into the Chase? “It’s all about points,” said Richard Childress in a story about the crash results published in USA Today.

Some speculated in June, when the double-file restarts were implemented, that the number of altercations could increase. But that isn’t the case. The new rule has only been in effect for half of a season, so let’s see what the results are at the end of next year. “The double-file restarts I would have thought would have increased that,” Jeff Gordon told USA Today. “And they still might (with) a whole season next year.”

Although the number of crashes is down, the question of what to do about the restrictor-plate races remains. Airborne race cars at both Talladega races last year left many wondering if it was time to install a flight control tower in the infield. NASCAR has spent years working on ways to keep the cars on the ground, including a no bump-drafting rule in the turns. But the problem still persists. NASCAR continues to consider a remedy and is looking at possible changes to the car for the 2010 season. Nevertheless, I’ll be holding my breath when the Daytona 500 rolls around.

This week's StockcarToon

Purchase your copy of "Nuts for Racing"

Back to top

SHARE

Join the Discussion:

Check this out for a full explanation of our conversion to the LiveFyre commenting system and instructions on how to sign up for an account.

Full comments policy